"Health Care For All" in lights on a bridge

A Healthy Blog

Massachusetts health care – wonky with a dose of reality

February 21, 2018

Last week, The Greater Boston Food Bank (GBFB) and Children’s HealthWatch released the first study of the health-related costs of hunger and food insecurity in Massachusetts. With one out of every 10 people in Massachusetts unable to afford enough food to lead an active, healthy life, An Avoidable $2.4 Billion Cost reveals exactly what its title says: the costs of debilitating health issues that are attributable to food insecurity are high…and avoidable.

The study breaks down the correlation between hunger and debilitating health issues that are attributable to food insecurity and presents the conditions – and their costs—in seven main categories:

  • Poor General Health: $635.4 million
  • Pulmonary Diseases: $572.6 million
  • Special Education: $520.3 million
  • Type 2 Diabetes: $251.1 million
  • Mental Health Conditions: $223.3 million
  • Obesity: $132.7 million
  • Rheumatology Diseases: $76.9 million

Hunger and food insecurity have particular and long-lasting ramifications for children—with negative effects that often persist through the lifespan. GBFB president and CEO Catherine D’Amato tells The Boston Globe: “If a child misses the right nutrition early on in their life…it can limit their potential to be an active citizen in their community. That damage is done.”

GBFB and Children’s HealthWatch encourage leaders in the health care community to join forces with policymakers at both the state and federal levels to reduce food insecurity, improve the health of food-insecure Massachusetts residents and reduce healthcare costs for individuals, families and the Commonwealth. Specific policy recommendations include:

  • Healthcare providers should screen patients routinely for food insecurity.
  • Congress should maintain the current funding levels and structure of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).
  • Funding of the Massachusetts Emergency Food Assistance Program, which helps the state’s food banks serve the 700,000 food-insecure people in our state, should be increased to $20 million in FY19
  • Massachusetts should implement a common application for MassHealth and SNAP.
  • Massachusetts high-poverty schools should institute breakfast after the bell programs.

 As a consumer advocacy organization, Health Care For All (HCFA) knows that social determinants of health—factors such as lack of affordable housing, food insecurity, transportation barriers, limited access to well-paying jobs, and exposure to violence—contribute to poor health outcomes, drive up health care costs, and create health inequities across race and income. HCFA believes that addressing the social determinants of health (SDOH)—including hunger and food insecurity—is a critical component of our mission to create a health care system that provides comprehensive, affordable, accessible, and culturally competent care to everyone in Massachusetts—especially the most vulnerable among us.

The new MassHealth Accountable Care Organization (ACO) program provides an opportunity to begin to address some of the SDOH needs of MassHealth members. HCFA will be monitoring how these new ACOs use “flexible funds” to address social service needs, and we hope to learn more about the SDOH needs of the ACO member populations and the impacts of these interventions over time as the ACO program rolls out.

-Natalie Litton

February 8, 2018

With the end of Open Enrollment approaching, Health Care For All (HCFA) decided to host one last enrollment session in the city of Framingham on Saturday, January 20th 2018 to help those residents who still needed assistance applying for health insurance. HCFA coordinated an event alongside Rede ABR Radio Brasileira, the Joint Committee for Children’s Health Care in Everett, and the Edward M. Kennedy Community Health Center to serve the community.

A group picture featuring all of our dedicated volunteers following a successful enrollment session

Upon arriving in Framingham, the team quickly realized that many people were in need of help. While the enrollment session was not scheduled to begin until 10 AM, the line was already snaking around the outside of the building at 7 AM. Temperatures started in the 20’s and didn’t climb much during the day so we knew that something had to be done to help those standing in line in the cold. Along with cold hands and noses, many of these residents had small children with them as well. Some residents were moved to a backroom opened by ABR Radio Brasileira, our host, where kids had activities to play with and adults could sit and wait with refreshments - and heat! We also collected phone numbers so that people who lived close by could wait at home and come back once their turn was approaching.

Thumbs up for health care! Who can disagree with that?

It can be difficult to estimate how many people will show up to a session of this nature and it is hard to plan accordingly but we had amazing volunteers and partners who adapted quickly and committed to help as many attendees as possible.

The outreach strategies used with our partner organizations were very successful. We implemented an advertising campaign in Spanish and Portuguese on both radio and TV to reach out to diverse communities in the area. Ilma Paixao, who leads ABR Radio, and her team were very effective not just at broadcasting the information about the enrollment session but also connecting with the communities to make them feel welcome and safe, including offering their space to host the event itself. This successful ethnic media campaign was made possible thanks to Blue Cross Blue Shield of MA and the Community Charitable Donation by Sanofi Genzyme. These outreach strategies resulted in many individuals attending who preferred to use Portuguese or Spanish as their primary language. This was not a problem for our team as we had 14 volunteers who were fluent in Portuguese and English with the remaining 5 volunteers being a mix of Spanish speakers and English speakers. 

Health care volunteers hard at work!

Some of the attendees came with questions that could be answered in 10 minutes. Other residents needed to fill out entire applications that can take an hour to complete. We were able to serve most of the people standing in line on the same day, but we knew that four hours would not suffice to meet the needs of all the community members who showed up. We had to do something to help as many as possible. We decided to call the remaining residents on the list and screen them over-the-phone to see if they needed help applying for health insurance before the end of Open Enrollment under the Health Connector. Those who qualified for Connector coverage were asked to call the HelpLine before the end of Tuesday to fill out an application. We also shared magnets with the HelpLine number with people who had questions about other kinds of coverage and asked them to connect to our enrollment experts after the 23rd to make sure that we could help those who needed to take action before the deadline. 

A busy room with a flurry of health care enrollments!

At the latest count, 782 people were served as a result of the Framingham enrollment session. In fact, that number continues to grow as more and more people keep calling into our office regarding coverage questions because they heard about HCFA through the outreach campaign for this session. Word of the event spread so far that we assisted residents from as far away as Lowell, Peabody, and even Cape Cod. This is one of our most successful events as a Navigator organization working with the Massachusetts Health Connector and with the support of the MetroWest Health Foundation. 

All smiles after enrolling in health care coverage

December 8, 2017

Governor Baker, along with the governors of Oregon, Montana, and Nevada, today published an op-ed in the New York Times urging Congress to reauthorize funding the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP), the program that provides health coverage to almost nine million children of low-income families across the country. The op-ed emphasized the benefits to kids’ health that CHIP has brought about since its creation in 1997 and the disastrous consequences of allowing the program to expire.

“Since the program went into effect, the percentage of children who are uninsured has dropped from 15 percent to 5.3 percent. Children who would otherwise be uninsured can now visit doctors for the regular checkups all kids should have and get the treatment they need when they’re sick or hurt, whether they’re suffering from a sore throat, a broken bone or a life-threatening illness. CHIP doesn’t just provide insurance coverage for children — it indirectly provides financial stability for many working families who depend on the program to cover their children’s health care. Many of them would otherwise be financially devastated by their kids’ hospital bills.”

Funding for CHIP expired at the end of September, and states will soon run out of the reserve funds they have been using to continue the program. In Massachusetts, CHIP provides coverage for 172,000 children. The Commonwealth will lose $295 million in federal funding if CHIP is not reauthorized. Coverage for many would be at risk, and losing federal funding for the program will be a major blow to the state’s budget. 

Governor Baker has taken a leading role in advocating for the reauthorization of the Children’s Health Insurance Program and for community health centers. Federal funding for community health centers also expired at the end of September. In Massachusetts, community health centers provide primary care to about one million residents, or about one seventh of the state’s population.    

Governor Baker and Oregon’s Governor Brown sent a letter to Congress at the end of November asking for reauthorization of CHIP, funding for community health centers, and funding for a federal home visiting program. The letter explained how, even if CHIP funding is ultimately reauthorized, the delay in funding is already causing harm.

“Absent congressional action, states will be forced to take steps including the notification of thousands of families of the loss of CHIP health care coverage. Taking steps to avoid those worst-case outcomes places a tremendous administrative and financial burden on states and sows confusion among vulnerable populations.”

Health Care For All thanks Governor Baker for his consistent advocacy on behalf of these vital programs.

November 20, 2017

Funding for the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) expired on September 30. CHIP provides health insurance for children and pregnant mothers who are low-income but are not eligible for Medicaid. States have a limited amount of funds left to maintain the program, but without federal reauthorization, these funds will soon run out. CHIP has been responsible for a massive decrease in the number of uninsured children throughout the country. When CHIP became law in 1997, 14 percent of people below the age of 18 were uninsured. By 2015, this number had decreased to less than 5 percent. In Massachusetts, CHIP covers about 160,000 children, including 7,000 expecting mothers. CHIP has helped the Commonwealth reach the incredible rate of 99 percent insurance coverage for children, which is the highest in the nation. According to updated estimates provided by MassHealth, without Congressional action, Massachusetts will exhaust its federal CHIP funding in mid-January.

Federal funding for community health centers expired on the same day. Community health centers are a vital part of the health care system, and a lack of federal funding will throw these health centers into a finical crisis, affecting a massive portion of the population. Many community health centers, uncertain when funding may reauthorized, are already experiencing considerable financial stress, which is hampering their ability to function effectively. In Massachusetts, community health centers provide primary care to one in seven state residents, or about 1 million people. Community health centers tend to serve large amounts of patients without private insurance, including those covered through Medicaid and those who are uninsured. The most vulnerable members of our society will be disproportionately affected if community health centers are forced to cut services due to a lack of federal funding.

Senator Elizabeth Warren recently posted a video calling for the reauthorization of funds for both CHIP and community health centers. Health Care For All commends Senator Warren for her commitment in fighting for these vital programs. HCFA calls on Congress to work together to forge a clean bipartisan agreement on funding of both CHIP and community health centers, two essential components of our health care system. 

November 16, 2017

The Massachusetts legislature recently passed legislation, called the Contraceptive ACCESS bill, to ensure access to birth control in Massachusetts. The bill now needs the signature of the Governor to become law.

The Affordable Care Act mandates coverage of birth control without copayments. However, the Trump administration recently moved to roll back this requirement by allowing employers to request exemptions from this requirement based on religious or moral beliefs. This could result in some employers choosing to no longer cover birth control in the insurance plans they offer to workers.

The ACCESS bill ensures that, even with this action on the federal level, employers in Massachusetts will continue to provide employees with coverage for birth control without copayments.

This bill also increases access to birth control in several other ways. It allows women to receive a 12- month supply of oral contraceptives at once, instead of requiring women to repeatedly return to the pharmacy to renew their prescription throughout the year.

This legislation further allows for women to access emergency contraception without a copayment or new prescription, which is vital to ensure timely access. Before this legislation, a woman would need to get a prescription to receive emergency contraception without a copayment. Emergency contraception is meant to be taken immediately, so being forced to wait for a prescription could undermine the effectiveness of the medication.

Access to contraception is critical to the health and wellbeing of women and their families. Health Care For All believes birth control should be available to all who need it, regardless of economic status. HCFA supports this legislation as a measure to increase access to birth control in Massachusetts and to protect against attacks on access to affordable birth control from the federal level.  

(Image courtesy of NARAL Pro-Choice Massachusetts

October 31, 2017

With Halloween upon us, we are enjoying the playfulness of costumes and trick or treating. As we are passing out sweets to all the cute ghosts and dinosaurs, we should be concerned that families are wondering whether the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) will be available to their children in the coming months and years.

As of September 30, Congress allowed funding for CHIP to expire. This puts at risk health insurance coverage for nearly 9 million children, which is scary. In early October, committees in each chamber of Congress made some progress by passing similar legislative language extending CHIP funding for five years. This is an example of the longstanding bipartisan support for CHIP and is certainly something to celebrate. However, the House version of the legislation contains other policy proposals and worrisome methods of covering the costs of CHIP funding. This means that House and Senate leadership are still negotiating how to pay for CHIP, and there are clear signals that they still have not come to an agreement.

Unfortunately—despite Congress’ progress—the urgency of refunding the program is only increasing. Last week, the Georgetown Center on Children and Families released a report outlining the consequences of Congress’ delayed action. As the report notes, the children most at risk of losing coverage live in states with CHIP programs that are running out of funds more quickly. Some states like Minnesota might run out of funds as early as November while other states could run out of funds by December or early January. Arizona, California, Florida, Texas and the District of Columbia are among the states slated to run out most quickly. This means that kids could lose coverage, including a disproportionate proportion of children of color because those states enroll some of the highest percentages of children of color.

Meanwhile, making changes to CHIP takes time and states cannot complete the necessary steps moments before they exhaust their funds. Even states that estimate their funding will stretch a bit farther into 2018 have already started taking action to wind down their program. Colorado, Texas, Virginia and Washington all plan to send notices to families in December alerting them that their coverage is ending. Utah has taken an even more significant step by submitting a plan to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to close their program once they exhaust their funds.

Children, families and states need swift action to address the uncertainty around CHIP funding. Despite ongoing efforts to reach consensus on how to pay for CHIP, Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy announced that he would hold a floor vote on the House’s version of the CHIP funding legislation this week. This House vote threatens the bipartisan support that CHIP has had for more than 20 years. As the House moves forward with a vote, Democratic leadership argues Republicans are pushing ahead on partisan terms rather than working together to identify ways to pay for CHIP funding that would not harm other people.

It’s not a Halloween trick; it’s true: Without Congressional reauthorization, Massachusetts will exhaust its federal Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) funds by March 2018. Here in the Commonwealth, CHIP is a part of MassHealth, along with Medicaid. Losing CHIP would be scary for the 160,000 Massachusetts children who depend on it for their health care. CHIP enables Massachusetts to provide health care coverage to children whose family incomes exceed the Medicaid eligibility standards but may not be high enough to afford private health insurance. In Massachusetts, 10% of children depend on CHIP for their health care, and 25% of children in the MassHealth program are covered by CHIP. In addition, CHIP currently provides health insurance to 7,000 expectant mothers who are not eligible for Medicaid. Without CHIP reauthorization, these mothers would lose access to prenatal care.

We must be loud and clear that Congress should pass a five-year extension of CHIP funding with bipartisan agreement on both policy and funding. Our little ghosts and goblins deserve it.

This post was written in concert with Community Catalyst

October 26, 2017

This Monday, Health Care For All testified before the Special Senate Committee on Health Care Cost Containment and Reform during a public hearing on the Senate health package (An Act furthering health empowerment and affordability by leveraging transformative health care) released the previous week. This major legislation affects a wide range of topics throughout the health care system. In our testimony, Health Care For All touched on a few of the provisions we think will impact consumers.

Major Items Highlighted by Health Care For All:

Prescription Drugs

Health Care For All supports the provision in this bill which authorizes an evidence-based education program for drug prescribers. To best prescribe to patients, doctors must keep up with a constantly evolving drug market and new clinical research. Meanwhile, the pharmaceutical industry spends billions of dollars in marketing directly to doctors, promoting new, high cost drugs even if these drugs don’t improve outcomes. This education program can help providers prescribe based on clinical data instead of promotional information.

HCFA also supports the introduction of transparency measures for prescription drug pricing. The rapidly rising cost of prescription drugs places major burdens on consumers and the state budget. However, Health Care For All urges for stronger transparency than is currently in the legislation. We believe that any information the state gathers on prices should be made available to the public, and that a substantial penalty should be levelled against any drug company that withholds pricing information.

Dental Therapists

Health Care For All strongly supports the authorization of dental therapists in this legislation. Dental therapists are mid-level providers who are trained to provide basic but vital services, including preventive dental care and basic restorative care such as filling cavities. Authorization for dental therapists will help expand these important services which too many Massachusetts residents are currently unable to access.

Another panel also testified on the importance of dental therapists. Dr. Kerry Maguire of Forsyth Kids spoke on the importance of dental therapists to increase the number of providers that can fill cavities for children, saying that currently, “if every dentist in the state picked up a dental drill and never put it down, we would still not be able to treat all the cavities out there. The problem is simply too great.”

Katherine Soal, a dental hygienist and former president of the Massachusetts Dental Hygienist Association, spoke on how dental therapists could help treat problems before they become severe. She gave the example of a patient she knew with cerebral palsy who developed an extreme dental issue and needed hospitalization, and she said that the hospitalization could have been prevented by early treatment from a dental therapist.

Maura Sullivan of The ARC of Massachusetts spoke on the benefits dental therapists could have for people with developmental disabilities. She said she has worked with the state to ensure dental therapists will have training in providing oral health care to people with these disabilities. She spoke on the difficulty she has had in finding a dentist for her own children, and said that dental therapists with this training could benefit many patients who currently have trouble finding dentists who are willing to treat individuals with developmental disabilities.

MassHealth

Health Care For All was also pleased by the decision to not include damaging provisions in this legislation. Last summer, the Governor proposed a series of MassHealth cuts that would have reduced eligibility, limited benefits, and imposed barriers to keeping coverage and continuity of care. Many of these cuts required legislative authorization, and the Senate referred the issues to this Senate special committee. The committee did not include these provisions in this legislation, which shows their disapproval of the proposed cuts.

Prevention and Wellness Trust Fund

Health Care For All commended the Senate working group for including reauthorization of the Prevention and Wellness Trust Fund in this legislation. The PWTF is a successful pilot program which promotes public health through preventive care and promotion of healthy behaviors. Public health is an extremely important area of focus as it improves quality of life and cuts down on costs. It’s generally much cheaper to invest in keeping people healthy than paying for costly care when people become sick. Health Care For All urged the Senate to include a permanent source of funding for the program in this legislation.

Hospital Readmissions

October 19, 2017

The Massachusetts Senate issued its comprehensive health care reform bill this Tuesday, and Health Care For all participated in the release of the legislation. Health Care For All’s executive director, Amy Rosenthal, spoke during the event and highlighted some of the priorities of consumers in the current system. The bill contains over 150 sections, and many elements of the bill align with the needs of consumers.

Watch our executive director's full comments on the legislation here.

Public Health and Social Determinants of Health 

The bill was put together by a Senate working group, who spoke on different aspects of the bill. Senator Jason Lewis emphasized the importance of public health, saying that “the social determinants of health are absolutely critical in determining health outcomes and health disparities.” He pointed out that promoting health outcomes also helps to decrease health costs, as healthier populations require less care.

This legislation promotes public health in several ways. It reauthorizes the Prevention and Wellness Trust Fund, a successful pilot program which promotes community disease prevention by supporting healthy behavior and increasing preventative care.

The legislation also addresses housing as an important social determinant of health by establishing a housing security task force to investigate housing programs, including prioritizing shelter beds for homeless patients discharged from emergency rooms, and by allowing housing providers and health care plans to coordinate location-based care.

Amy Rosenthal also emphasized the importance of public health, saying “We focus too much on curing people when they’re sick, and not enough on prevention and keeping them healthy.”

Telemedicine

This legislation would help promote telemedicine services by permitting the coverage of telemedicine services through MassHealth and updating requirements for commercial health plans to provide coverage for telemedicine.

Telemedicine has been proposed as a way to help increase access to services for those with limited mobility and for those who live far away from medical professionals, particularly in rural areas. Behavioral health is often considered to be one field where telemedicine may be particularly effective.

Dental Therapists

Senate Majority Leader Harriette Chandler spoke on the importance of promoting dental health. “Dental health is just as important as any other health care pursuit, but so many people in this state lack access to this service.

This legislation aims to increase access to dental health by establishing a dental therapist certification. Dental therapists are mid-level providers who are trained to provide basic but vital services, such as preventive dental care and filling cavities. This bill would allow dental therapists to deliver care in community settings, such as schools and nursing homes, which would help ensure access to populations who may have a difficult time traveling to the dentist’s office. “With dental therapists,” said Senator Chandler, “dental health services are delivered directly to those in the most need.”

Dental therapists would also help to decrease health care costs. Because they are mid-level providers with a more restricted scope of practice than dentists, dental therapists generally charge less for services than dentists do. Increasing access to preventive dental care will also help lower costs by decreasing the number of patients who utilize the emergency department for oral health issues.

Amy Rosenthal also spoke on oral health, saying that “We need to get people the oral health care that they need, and get them out of emergency departments when that’s not where they should be.”

Prescription Drug Costs

Prescription drug costs are one of the main drivers of rising health care costs, and growth in prescription drug spending is one of the most rapidly increasing parts of health care spending.

This legislation takes several steps to address these costs. The legislation increases transparency for providers and consumers. It would establish an academic detailing program to educate prescribers on drug outcomes based on medical evidence and not pharmaceutical advertisements. It would also require pharmacists to inform a consumer if the amount they are paying for a drug through insurance is higher than the direct retail rate that they would pay without insurance, which is sometimes the case due to the complex and hidden factors in drug pricing. If the price with insurance is higher, the consumer would be able to buy the drug at the lower retail rate.

The legislation would also create reports on the impact and potential cost saving of the state engaging in prescription drug bulk purchase consortiums.

Surprise Out-of-Network Billing

Amy Rosenthal said that “We need to… shut down surprise medical bills.” Surprise out-of-network billing refers to a situation where a patient is receiving care in a hospital that is in their insurance network, but is treated by a specific doctor who does not accept that insurance, resulting in an unexpected and large fee for the patient. This is a major financial stress for consumers. This legislation would guarantee that the patient would not have to pay an additional copay or deductible when this happens.

- Sean Connolly 

October 6, 2017

On Monday and Tuesday this week, the Massachusetts Health Policy Commission (HPC) held its 5th annual Health Care Cost Trends hearing. Government officials, health care providers, insurers, and advocates came together to provide testimony and answer questions from the HPC commissioners on strategies to contain health care costs.

Below are some of the major themes from the hearing, a number of which were also reflected in Health Care For All’s testimony to the HPC. You can read our full testimony here.

Massachusetts is below the state benchmark for spending growth, but there is more work to be done:

Massachusetts successfully remained under the state benchmark for health care spending growth in 2016. As of 2014, Massachusetts health care spending growth was the fourth lowest in the nation. In 2015 and 2016, Massachusetts remained below the US average in health care spending growth.

However, major problems remain in our health care spending. In 2014, Massachusetts still spent the second most in the country on health care per person, exceeded only by Alaska. It is estimated that about 26% of an average Massachusetts family’s wages go towards health care costs. Families with a greater number of health issues tend to pay even more, and often have a difficult time affording care.

Commissioners emphasized that, while lowering growth rates to below the benchmark has been a success, much more work is needed to lower costs. Commissioners also made it clear that cost cutting measures shouldn’t impact access to care for Massachusetts residents.

Unnecessary Hospital Use and Readmissions:

One cost containment method identified repeatedly at the hearing was reducing unnecessary hospital use, particularly hospital readmissions. A readmission is when a patient returns to a hospital within 30 days of being discharged from a previous hospital stay. Data presented at the hearing showed that Massachusetts readmission rates grew between 2015 and 2016.

While decreasing readmissions would help to decrease overall spending, several panelists at the hearing pointed out the challenges of preventing readmissions. Particularly for patients with chronic conditions, readmissions may be a result of the illness and do not necessarily indicate errors on the part of the hospital. The question was also raised if reducing readmissions is the best strategy to support vulnerable populations. Some panelists cautioned against any strategies that would financially penalize patients who make multiple hospital visits within a short time period, as this could end up preventing these patients from accessing needed care.

Those suffering from addiction and those with behavioral health conditions were identified as groups more likely to have a readmission. Because of this, improving treatment for addiction and behavioral health was identified as one way to help lower readmission rates. One panelist commented that, when a patient is in the hospital for an overdose, they can be provided detox services, “but where do they go after?” Without adequate resources invested in treatment and recovery programs, people suffering from addiction may repeatedly return to the hospital. Commissioners also identified improved care coordination and engaging patients more actively in their care as a way to decrease unnecessary readmissions.

Social Determinants of Health:

Both commissioners and panelists identified social determinants of health as a key contributing factor to high health care costs. Several commissioners noted that there has not yet been enough done to invest in programs that focus on these social determinants.  

The importance of ensuring that communities have access to necessities such as nutritious food, transportation, housing and infrastructure was repeatedly stressed during the hearing. These resources allow communities to maintain better health overall and to access health care services when needed. One community health center CEO mentioned that a lack of transportation and infrastructure are major issues for patients, and that the health center provides transportation services to some patients to ensure they are able to access care. While a number of panelists and commissioners agreed that providers and payers should be doing more to invest in addressing unmet social needs, they also expressed concerns about how to do this without adding more money to the system.

One specific program mentioned during the hearing was the Prevention and Wellness Trust Fund. This fund promotes healthy behaviors, which helps to prevent illness and hospitalizations and improve health outcomes. The fund’s authorization expired this summer, and it has not been reauthorized in the current state budget. Health Care For All believes that allowing funding to lapse for this program is a shortsighted approach to containing cost, as the program will reduces overall cost in the long term by creating a healthier population which has less need for costly medical care.

Keeping Care in the Community:

September 26, 2017

The Graham-Casidy proposal to repeal the Affordable Care Act seems to have stalled, with Republican senators expressing public opposition, but the defeat of repeal isn't guaranteed

Public pressure needs to be maintained to keep these senators accountable and to pressure other senators to join in opposing the Graham-Cassidy plan. 

As part of an ongoing effort to prevent the passage of this damaging bill, on Monday, September 25, Health Care For All submitted comments to the Senate Committee on Finance detailing why this bill would be harmful for health care consumers in Massachusetts and throughout the country. The bill would undermine protections for people with pre-existing conditions, lead to millions of people becoming uninsured, and greatly reduce federal funding for health care. The proposal would be particularly damaging for states such as Massachusetts that have expanded Medicaid, as these states would see large cuts to federal funding, placing massive financial strain on state budgets.

The Oral Health Advocacy Task Force which HCFA leads also submitted a letter focusing on the alarming oral health aspects of the Graham-Cassidy bill. That letter is available here.

Read our full letter below

 


Dear Chairman Hatch and Ranking Member Wyden:

On behalf of Health Care For All (HCFA), thank you for the opportunity to submit comments on the Graham-Cassidy-Heller-Johnson health care proposal. HCFA is a Massachusetts nonprofit advocacy organization working to create a health care system that provides comprehensive, affordable, accessible, and culturally competent care to everyone, especially the most vulnerable among us. We achieve this as leaders in public policy, advocacy, education and service to consumers in Massachusetts.

We write to voice our extreme opposition to the Graham-Cassidy-Heller-Johnson proposal. We are very discouraged that instead of continuing down a bipartisan path and working on issues to improve the strength and stability of the Affordable Care Act’s (ACA) marketplaces, the sponsors of this legislation have put forward a proposal that will:

  •  Eliminate the financial assistance that helps low- and moderate-income families purchase health care coverage;
  •  End expanded Medicaid coverage that helps millions of low-income adults;
  • Gut Medicaid through deep, permanent cuts that would grow over time and threaten care for millions of low-income seniors, children, and people living with disabilities and shift massive costs and risks to states;
  • Jeopardize access to life-saving and effective treatments for addiction and weaken states’ efforts to address the current crisis of drug overdose deaths
  • Undermine essential protections for people with pre-existing conditions; and 
  • Resurrect - and worsen - the devastating cuts in coverage and benefits that the American public and the majority of Congress have already rejected.

The Graham-Cassidy-Heller-Johnson proposal threatens the health and financial security of millions of Americans including older adults, low-and moderate-income families, people living with disabilities, children, seniors, veterans and people with pre-existing conditions. It does nothing to improve affordability or availability of coverage for consumers and will likely result in approximately 665,000 Massachusetts residents losing coverage by 2027.1 This proposal will undermine the financial stability of our health care system and place additional fiscal strains on our state budget. We have come so far in Massachusetts, extending health coverage to 97.5% of our residents.2 To build support for the proposal, some have specifically singled out Massachusetts due to our state allegedly receiving a disproportionate amount of federal health care funds.3 Yet federal funds provided to Massachusetts mostly reflect the success we have had in our outreach and enrollment efforts, which have resulted in the lowest uninsurance rate nationally.

The Graham-Cassidy-Heller-Johnson proposal disproportionately impacts Massachusetts and other states that have expanded Medicaid. The bill would unravel this success in Massachusetts and devastate the lives of people in our state and across the country. Below we lay out in more detail our concerns with this proposal and the devastating impact it will have on consumers.

Eliminates programs that serve as a lifeline for low- and moderate-income families.

Pages